Style & Beauty
The Number on the Sunglasses Label Matters More Than “Polarised”
Sunglasses sold in Australia carry a lens category from 0 to 4. What it means, why polarised is about glare rather than UV, and the pair not to drive in.

Walk past any sunglasses stand at the start of summer and one word does most of the selling. It is on the sticker, the swing tag, the cardboard display and the shop assistant’s first sentence. Polarised. It is a real feature, it does something useful, and it is the word on the label that tells you least about whether the glasses protect your eyes from UV.
So here is the position this article argues. Polarised is about glare. The lens category is about the job the glasses are built to do, including how much sun they block, and in Australia that category is printed on every pair by law. The shops lead with the first word because it sells. You should read the number, because it is the rating.
This piece runs in a deliberate order: the rule that puts the number on the label, what each number means, what polarisation does and does not do, which category suits which day, and finally the one pair you should never wear behind the wheel. (If you came here from the summer style shelf, somewhere between the swimwear and the fake tan that has to last the week, the label is the part of the glasses worth thirty seconds of your attention.)
The rule behind every label
Sunglasses in Australia are not a free-for-all, whatever the bargain bin at the servo suggests. According to the ACCC’s Product Safety Australia, a mandatory safety standard has applied since 1 July 2019: the Consumer Goods (Sunglasses and Fashion Spectacles) Safety Standard 2017, which is based on the Australian and New Zealand standard AS/NZS 1067.1:2016.
It applies to all sunglasses and fashion spectacles sold here. ARPANSA, the federal radiation safety agency, confirms that the standard covers polarising, photochromic and gradient lenses as well as ordinary tinted ones. In other words, the polarised pair on the stand is held to exactly the same labelling rule as the plain pair beside it.
The rule on labelling is specific, and it is the part worth memorising. Under the standard, as the ACCC describes it, the label must show: the name of the supplier, the lens category number, a description of that category, information on how the glasses should be used, and any warnings that apply. The ACCC also says the label must not be covered by a price sticker. If the number is hiding under the price, the shop has got it wrong, and asking to see the label is entirely reasonable.
The five categories, in the ACCC’s words
The category number runs from 0 to 4. The ACCC’s descriptions are short, so here they are, without decoration.
| Category | What the ACCC says it is |
|---|---|
| 0 | Fashion spectacles, not sunglasses |
| 1 | Fashion spectacles, not sunglasses; not suitable for driving at night |
| 2 | Medium glare reduction, good UV protection |
| 3 | High glare reduction, good UV protection |
| 4 | Very high glare reduction, good UV protection; not suitable for driving and road use |
Two things jump out once the table is in front of you.
The first is that categories 0 and 1 are not sunglasses at all, in the regulator’s own description. They are fashion spectacles. A light tint that looks the part on a shop mirror may be sitting in this bracket, and the label is the only thing that will tell you.
The second is that from category 2 upwards the UV description stays the same (“good UV protection”) while the glare reduction climbs. The higher numbers are about how much light and glare the lens cuts, which is a question of comfort and the conditions you are in. It is the category system, not the word “polarised”, that tells you the glasses are sunglasses in the first place.
What polarisation does, and what it does not

Now the word on the sticker. ARPANSA’s explanation is plain: polarised lenses reduce glare from reflective surfaces, and they can ease eye strain. Anyone who has looked at a river on a bright day with and without them knows the effect, because the white sheet of reflection drops away and the water underneath appears.
That is a genuine benefit. It is also a separate thing from UV protection, and here is where the marketing quietly runs two ideas together. ARPANSA states that UV protection comes from the UV-absorbing properties of the lens material. It does not come from the colour of the lens or its tint, and a darker lens is not necessarily a more protective one.
So the polarising film handles glare, the lens material handles UV, and the tint handles how dark the world looks (three separate jobs, of which the sticker mentions exactly one, and rarely the one that matters most for your eyes in an Australian summer).
The position, then: buy polarised when the job involves water, roads or glare, which is often (fishing, boating, long drives into the afternoon sun). Never buy it as a proxy for UV protection. The proxy for UV protection is the category on the label.
That settles the question people keep asking online, which is whether polarised is worth having or mostly marketing. It is both, and the two halves are easy to separate. The feature is real: on water and on a bright road it changes what you can see. The marketing is the suggestion, made by placement rather than by any claim, that the word on the sticker is the protection. It is not, and nothing in the standard says it is. A polarised pair still has to carry a category like every other pair, and a polarised lens in a category that does not suit your day is the wrong pair, however well it handles glare.
One more test for the stand. If two pairs carry the same category and fit you equally well, the polarised one is the better buy only if you spend time near glare. If you do not, you are reading the wrong line on the label.
Which category for which day
This is where the number earns its keep, because the right one depends on where you will be wearing them.
ARPANSA recommends categories 2 and 3 for everyday use. That covers the commute, the school run, the weekend at the park and most days at the beach. Category 4 is for high-glare settings: at sea, on snowfields, in deserts and in the mountains, where the light bouncing off water, snow or sand is intense enough to justify the darkest lenses. If you are packing for the slopes, put the category 4 pair in the bag alongside the rest of the kit (our guide to what a first Australian snow trip costs covers the remainder of the list).
The Cancer Council adds a point that the category number does not cover on its own: fit. It recommends close-fitting, wraparound styles that meet the Australian standard, in categories 2, 3 or 4. A lens with an excellent rating does less good if sunlight is pouring in around the sides of a small, flat frame. Coverage is part of protection, and it is the part you can judge in a mirror.
Three illustrations make the point better than another rule. They are made-up shoppers, not case studies.
The first wants a pair for the drive to work and weekends in the park. Category 2 or 3, as ARPANSA recommends, close-fitting, and polarised only if road glare bothers her. The word on the sticker is optional for her. The number is not.
The second is heading out on a boat for the day. Glare off the water is the whole problem, so polarised earns its place here, and the sea is one of the high-glare settings where ARPANSA points to category 4. He will need a different pair for the drive to the boat ramp, which is the subject of the next section.
The third has found a light, pretty tint in the bargain bin and assumes it does the job because it is tinted. Check the label. If it says category 0 or 1, the regulator’s description is fashion spectacles, not sunglasses, whatever it looks like in the mirror.
The driving pair
There is one pair you should not drive in, and the label will tell you which.
Category 4 is, in the ACCC’s own wording, not suitable for driving and road use. The very high glare reduction that makes it ideal on a snowfield makes it too dark for the road, where you need to see what is in the shadows. Category 1 is not suitable for driving at night. And ARPANSA adds a related caution: very dark or strongly coloured lenses can affect your ability to see traffic signals properly, which is the last thing you want at an intersection.
The practical answer for most drivers is a category 2 or 3 pair, polarised if the glare off the road and other cars bothers you, kept in the car and not swapped for the snow pair because it happened to be nearer the door.
Read the swing tag before the price tag
The check takes about half a minute at the stand, and the order matters.
First, the category number. Find it on the label (and if a price sticker is sitting on top of it, ask). For everyday wear, look for 2 or 3. For snow, water or desert, 4. Never 4 for driving.
Second, fit and coverage. Close-fitting and wraparound, as the Cancer Council recommends. Light should not be leaking in at the sides or over the top.
Third, polarisation, if the job needs it. Water, roads, glare: yes, it is worth having. For anything else, it is a nice extra. It is never the rating.
The sticker will keep shouting the word it was designed to shout. The number on the label is the rating, and it is printed there by law for a reason.
Sources: Sunglasses and fashion spectacles mandatory standard, ACCC Product Safety Australia (https://www.productsafety.gov.au/standards/sunglasses-fashion-spectacles); Sun protection using sunglasses, ARPANSA (https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/radiation-sources/more-radiation-sources/sun-protection-sunglasses); Fact sheet: Eye protection, Cancer Council Australia (https://www.cancer.org.au/about-us/policy-and-advocacy/prevention/uv-radiation/related-resources/fact-sheet-eye-protection)
Style & Beauty
How Long Does Fake Tan Last? Why Yours Can Fade in Two Days
How long a fake tan lasts comes down to your skin and your aftercare, not the bottle. Why two-day fades happen, how to make it last, and how to remove it.

The wrists before the wedding
At six in the evening the tan looked the way it was supposed to look. By the speeches it has told on you: the wrists have gone patchy where they bend, there is a faint tide line at each ankle, and you are standing for the photographs with your arms folded, which you will later describe to yourself as a choice.
None of it was bad luck, and the tan did not fail: everything the bottle promised happened exactly as written. What nobody writes down is the part you are learning at a wedding, which is that the answer to “how long does fake tan last” is not a number, and was never going to be.
What self-tan actually is, and why that decides everything
The colour you got is not paint sitting on your skin. The active ingredient is colourless; what it does is react with the top layer of your skin, and the brown you see afterwards is, essentially, your own dead skin cells, stained.
Because the colour lives in that top layer, it lasts exactly as long as the layer does. Skin sheds constantly, faster in some places than others, and the colour leaves with it. Which means the question “how long does fake tan last” is really the question “how fast does your skin turn over”, and that is personal. It changes with your body, your age, the season, your shower temperature and everything you put on your skin afterwards. No bottle can answer a question about your skin. It can only describe the person who tested it.
Why every range you read says something different
Look at the published answers sometime, all in one sitting. One skincare site says a spray tan can last ten days to two weeks. A tanning brand says three to seven days on average. Another says four to six for most users. A summary floating at the top of search results says five to seven at home and seven to ten for spray. A salon page says five to ten.
Read together, they contradict each other, and the temptation is to call all of them wrong. That is not quite what is happening. They are different products measured by different people with different skin and wildly different aftercare, and most of the places publishing them are selling something. None of those ranges is a fix on you. Each is a description of somebody else.
The honest version is narrower and more useful: the only reliable prediction is a range for your own skin, built from your own last few tans. A reader who tracks two or three applications learns more than any article can tell them, this one included.
Why yours can last two days
When a tan vanishes in two days, one of the following is almost always behind it.
Going too hard with the exfoliant beforehand. Preparation matters, but there is a version of it that scrubs away the exact layer the tan is about to live in. Gentle, a day or two ahead, not the hour before.
Oil. In body wash, in moisturiser, in the cleanser used to take off makeup. Oil dissolves the colour, which is why remover products lean on it; it accounts for many two-day fades, and most people cannot tell you which of their bottles contain it.
The colour guide washing off in the first shower. Many products carry a temporary bronzer so the reader can see where they have applied it, and it rinses away in the first wash. It looks like the tan failing; it is not, and the real colour is still developing underneath. The false alarm fools people every time.
Hot water, shaving, swimming and chlorine. Each strips the top layer of skin faster than it would leave on its own, and a long hot shower plus an afternoon in a chlorinated pool is most of a tan gone.
And tight clothing on the first day, which rubs where a tan is trying to settle. Loose and soft until it has.
The moisturiser contradiction, resolved
Here is the confusion that draws the most replies in every comment section, and both things readers have heard are true.

Yes: moisturise the dry areas before applying, meaning the knees, elbows, ankles, wrists and hands, because dry skin grabs more colour, which is how those spots end up darker and uneven.
No: do not put oil-based moisturiser on all over beforehand. Oil breaks the tan down and stops it developing evenly. The two pieces of advice are not in conflict: one is about a small amount of product on specific dry spots, before; the other is about the whole body, and it applies to oil at any time. Read them as one rule: moisturiser in the dry places, oil nowhere.
Getting it even
Two places let a tan down more than anywhere else.
Hands and feet. They bend, they crease, they take colour unevenly, and the first attempt usually makes them worse by trying harder. Do them last, with what is left on the mitt rather than fresh product, and wipe the palms, knuckles and nails afterwards. If the feet are their own recurring project, that is a skin question rather than a tan question, and the site’s guide to when a professional treatment is worth it and when it is not covers it properly: treat the skin first, and the colour behaves.
Chest and shoulders. The area readers say never goes as dark. The reason is mechanical: the skin there bends and stretches all day, the product moves with it, and the first coat goes on thinner because of the angle. The fix is not more product the first time; it is a second light coat, once the first has developed.
The technique readers swear by holds up: two light coats, a day apart, outlast one heavy coat and go far less patchy. Less product applied twice beats more applied once.
Making it last, honestly
What genuinely buys days is unglamorous: pat dry after showers rather than rubbing, use a gentle body wash, retire the loofah while the tan is on, moisturise daily with something oil-free, and rinse chlorine off the moment you are out of the water. None of it is dramatic; it is the difference between a tan leaving on its own schedule and one evicted early.
Two things cost days: a long hot shower, and chlorine, and if a pool day is coming, time the tan around it.
And the honest version of the famous “up to two weeks”: that belongs to a professionally applied tan with ideal aftercare, on skin that cooperates. It is a ceiling some people reach, not the typical result, and no product should be judged against a number most of its own customers will never see.
Removing it without wrecking your skin
This part stays short on purpose.
Time, gentle exfoliation, an oil-based cleanser worked in before a shower, and patience will remove a tan. That is the whole method. What will not help, and what can actively hurt: scrubbing hard, reaching for a harsh exfoliant every day, and the kitchen-cabinet remedies that circulate in forums, meaning bleach, lemon and anything else that was not made for skin. The tan sits in the top layer; beneath it is the skin that is the barrier, and damaging it to speed the colour along is a bad trade.
The useful turn, though: if the tan has gone streaky and an event is close, the fix is more tan, not more scrubbing. A second light application evens up what is there and adds days, where an aggressive scrub leaves you raw, patchy and further from the look you wanted.
The safety line nobody draws
Two very different things get blurred under the phrase “is fake tan bad for you”, and pulling them apart is the most useful thing here.
Topical self-tan products, the kind this article is about, are applied to the skin. The guidance is straightforward: patch test if you know your skin reacts, do not apply to broken or irritated skin, keep the product away from the eyes and mouth, and do not inhale the mist from a spray. That is the honest extent of it, and this article makes no medical claims either way.
The other thing is not a cosmetic at all. Melanotan injections and nasal sprays are sold online as tanning products, and they are a different category entirely: prescription-only medicines in Australia, not approved as tanning agents, and there are no Melanotan II products on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. The Therapeutic Goods Administration has tested seized nasal sprays and found the doses inside wildly inconsistent from one bottle to the next. It has issued infringement notices totalling five figures against unlawful supply, and it reports serious side effects, including kidney failure, muscle breakdown and priapism. It states plainly that there is no evidence these products protect against skin cancer, and its advice to anyone holding one is to stop using it and take it to a pharmacy for disposal. Where these products are sold with confident claims attached, the discipline is the same one the site applied to gut health powders, where the label promised more than the evidence supported: confidence is not evidence, and a checkout page is not a pharmacist.
And then the line that belongs in every piece about tanning: a fake tan is not sun protection. The colour is cosmetic and gives no meaningful protection from UV; the safety a base seems to offer is an illusion. Sun protection remains hats, shade, clothing, sunscreen and reapplication, and Cancer Council is the authority worth reading on that and on tanning more broadly.
One cultural note, kept short: a lot of the pressure to tan is social rather than personal, and readers say so themselves. The tan is a choice, and this article is not going to argue anyone out of it, or pretend the pressure is not there. The practical advice above works the same either way.
The honest version, including what to skip
Skip the multi-step kits if this is a first attempt; one well-applied product teaches you more than a shelf of bottles. Skip the express formula if your tan already goes patchy, because fast development is even less forgiving of uneven skin. Skip the second coat if the first one is right; the layering advice here is a fix for a problem, not a rule to follow off a cliff. And skip the whole exercise if you are happy as you are. That is a legitimate outcome, and nothing in this article is an argument against it.
What the number leaves out
Every range you have read leaves out the only variable that matters to you, which is you: your skin, your aftercare, your week. The number was never on the bottle, and the sooner a reader stops shopping for the one promising the longest, the sooner tans start behaving. Get the preparation and the aftercare right, learn your own range from your own last few, and plan the second light coat before the event rather than the rescue after it. The wedding photographs will take care of themselves.
Sources: Therapeutic Goods Administration – Melanotan II tanning products safety alert · Cancer Council Australia – tanning, solariums and skin cancer · Australian Competition and Consumer Commission – health and beauty claims
Home & Garden1 year agoPolycarbonate Roofing: What It Is Good For, and What It Is Not
Travel1 year agoGetting Involved in Alice Springs: Clubs, Events and Community Groups
Healthcare1 year agoPlantar Warts: The Treatment Ladder, From Patience to Surgery
Healthcare1 year agoGP Chronic Condition Management Plans: How Medicare Funds Ongoing Care (the plan formerly called EPC)
Healthcare1 year agoHeel Pain: Five Causes, One Order of Treatment
Healthcare1 year agoThe Role of Speech Therapy in Treating Common Speech & Language Disorders
Travel12 months agoThe Ultimate Family Guide to Uluru: Fun Things to Do, Where to Stay & What to Pack
Healthcare1 year agoLaser Treatment for Nail Fungus: What It Involves and What the Evidence Says















